Sask. mining industry applauds speedier environmental reviews
While Shore Gold’s Star-Orion South diamond project located east of Prince
Albert is awaiting environmental approval — a new regulatory system announced in
Thursday’s federal budget will shorten the process for other
companies.
The federal government is overhauling its environmental review
system which will drastically shorten the amount of time resource projects are
hung up in the review stage.
Under the new rules only one review would be
required, either at the provincial or federal level, and the entire process
would take no longer than 24 months.
The Saskatchewan Mining Association
(SMA) applauds the regulatory reform.
“We think that’s really going be of
great assistance in making the system more efficient and more timely, said Pam
Schwann, executive director of the SMA.
“It will hopefully affect some of
the uranium projects in a more favorable manor because those are the ones that
typically get hung up on the federal triggers for environmental assessment more
than others.”
Schwann explained that streamlining the review process will
also make Canada more competitive on the global stage.
“Right now
projects in Australia, that we compete with on some developments, can be
reviewed in less than a year and so when you compare investors looking at
projects proceeding in the review process in less than a year to in Canada to
over seven years, you know where the dollars are going to flow.”
The
speedier assessments are part of the government’s plan to encourage economic
growth through resource development.
Mining is already a major economic
driver for Saskatchewan and the industry is forecasting $50 billion of
investments over the next 20 years with the need hire 15,000 workers within 10
years.
Schwann said cutting the red tape may entice even more investment
here.
Critics argue the federal government is giving up stewardship of
the environment, but Schwann said they’re not asking for lower environmental
standards, just a more fair and efficient process.
“I think people have
to understand that a review process that takes seven years is certainly not
reasonable. If you were an individual that had a project you would think that is
awfully cumbersome.”
bbosker@panow.com



